Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

From perusal of the entire explanation and the status report, I find that the learned Judicial Magistrate Shri Piyush Srivastava and his predecessor in Court had acted very casually without showing their commitment to the cause of quick justice since charge could not be framed within span of six years in a complaint case, when there was no stay of further proceeding in Complaint Case No.22 of 2005 recorded by this Court in Cr.M.P.No.1166 of 2006. The Officer is, therefore, cautioned to be careful in future and is expected to do his assigned Judicial Work diligently and promptly.