Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
It has further been submitted on behalf of the applicant that though undoubtedly, the learned Trial Court has not taken into account the voice examination report of the CFSL which is exhibited as Ex.PW14/A having observed vide paragraph 71 of the impugned judgment to the effect that the same was not taken into consideration for the reason that the CFSL, New Delhi has admittedly not been notified by the Central Government under Section 79A of the Information Technology, 2002 for giving expert opinion on electronic form of evidence, qua which learned SPP for the CBI submits that the voice examination and the transcript/conversation would show the demand made for the illicit money by the applicant, on behalf of the applicant reliance is further sought to be placed on the testimony of PW-14 who was examined i.e. Mr.Amitosh Kumar, Senior Scientific Officer in CFSL, Delhi as per which the request letter dated 28.07.2016 (D-18) was received in the laboratory from the CBI along with four sealed exhibits, specimen seal impression and copy of transcription on 29.07.2016 and he has inter alia stated to the effect that the hash value of the questioned voice was not sent to the examining laboratory by the CBI and that the examiner had also not asked the CBI to provide the hash value with it further having been stated by the said witness PW-14 that it was correct that the hash value is one of the parameters for detecting tampering of the questioned voices and that they prepared the wave from the chart to detect tampering in a voice sample and they have not annexed any wave form chart along with the report.