Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

10. We have already set out the contention of Mr, 3. G. Thakore based on the provisions of Section 3. Th3 contention briefly was that by reason of Section 3, Section 111 of the Transfer of Properly Act applied to a deemed tenancy under Section 4 and a deemed tenancy under Section 4 was, therefore, heritable by virtue of the application of Section 111 of the Transfer of Properly Act. The contention was based on the rather curious premise that Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act by omitting to provide that a tenancy shall be determined on the death of a tenant made the tenancy heritable and that a deemed tenancy under Section 4 to which Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act applied was also, therefore, heritable. The premise is, in our opinion, clearly wrong. A contractual tanancy under the Transfer of Property Act is heritable not because of Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act but because it constitutes an estate or interest in the land which passes on to the heirs by the operation of the Law of Succession. Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act merely provides various modes for determination of a contractual tenancy but so long as a contractual tenancy is not determined by any of the modes provided by that Section and continues to subsist, it can always devolve by succession, testate or intestate. Of course if Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act had provided that the tenancy of a tenant shall be determined on his death, the tenancy would not have been heritable by the heirs nor would it have been capable of passing by testamentary disposition but that would have been so, because the tenancy having come to an end on the death of the tenant, there would have been no property which could be inherited by the heirs or which could pass by testamentary disposition. Such an express provision in Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act would have prevented the operation of the Law of Succession by destroying the properly belonging to the tenant. But when there is no such express provision in Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act, the law of succession operates on the property of the tenant, namely, his estate or interest in the land, and the tenancy devolves on the heirs if there is intestacy and on the legatees if there Is testamentary disposition. Such legal result follows on account of the law of succession and not on account of Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act. It is, therefore, not right on the part of Mr. B. G. Thakore to contend that because Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act applies to a deemed tenancy under Section 4, a deemed tenancy under Section 4 is heritable. If Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act does not make a contractual tenancy heritable, equally it cannot make a deemed tenancy under Section 4 heritable. Besides it is not a correct proposition to state that Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act applies to a deemed tenancy under Section 4. The provisions of Chapter V of the Transfer of Property Act are not applicable to agricultural leases by reason of Section 117 of the Transfer of Property Act. Section 3, therefore, makes those provisions applicants to agricultural leases in so far as they are not inconsistent with the Tenancy Act. What Section 3 intends to achieve Is to put agricultural leases on the same footing as other leases in so far as the applicability of the provisions of Chapter V of the Transfer of Property Act is concerted except to the extent to which they are inconsistent with the provisions of the Tenancy Act. The provisions of Chapter V of the Transfer of Property Act are not extended by Section 3 to the artificial category of tenants created by the Tenancy Act, for by their very nature they are applicable only to contractual tenancies. But apart altogether from this consideration it is apparent that Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act cannot In any event apply to a deemed tenancy under Section 4 since it is inconsistent with Section 14 and the contention of Mr. B. G. Thakore based upon the applicability of Section 111 of the Transfer of Property Act by virtue of Section 3 must, therefore, fail.