Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

"41. This is not a case, we must reiterate, where the Governments have failed to take any steps for regularisation of their ad hoc employees working over the years. Every few years they have been issuing order providing for regularisation. In such a case, there is no occasion for the Court to issue any directions for regularizing such employees, more particularly when none of the conditions prescribed in the said orders can be said to be either unreasonable, arbitrary or discriminatory. The Court cannot obviously help those who cannot get regularized under these orders for their failure to satisfy the conditions prescribed therein. Issuing general declaration of indulgence is no part of our jurisdiction. In case of such persons, we can only observe that it is for the respective Governments to consider the feasibility of giving them appropriate relief, particularly in cases where persons have been continuing over a long number of years, and were eligible and qualified on the date of their ad hoc appointment and further whose record of service is satisfactory.
XXX XXX XXX
44. Before parting with this case, we think it appropriate to say a few words concerning the issue of regularisation of ad hoc/temporary employees in Government service.
XXX XXX XXX
49. If for any reason, an ad hoc or temporary employee is continued for a fairly long spell, the authorities must consider his case for regularisation provided he is eligible and qualified according to the rules and his service record is satisfactory and his appointment does not run counter to the reservation policy of the State.