Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

6.1.2007, the petitioner has paid an amount of Rs.10,000/-. It is further stated by the petitioner that as per Ext.P-16 dated 20.3.2007, he had also paid an amount of Rs.10,000/-. It is seen  ::11::

W.P(C).No.2054 Of 2010 that out of the total amount of Rs.1,25,000/- deposited by the petitioner, the 2nd respondent, as per Ext.P-12 dated 26.12.2007, has in turn remitted only an amount of Rs.1,19,047/- (comprising of Rs.21,047 + 49,000 + 49,000 = 1,19,047), after retaining the collection charges and other amounts due to the Revenue Recovery authority. However, it is seen that the amount of Rs.10,000/- said to have been paid by the petitioner as per Ext.P-16 dated 20.3.2007 is not seem to have been given due credit by the 1st respondent- Board. Under these circumstances, it is to be held that the petitioner should be duly given credit for a total amount of Rs.2,02,047/- referred to in the statement furnished by the 1st respondent-Board today plus an additional amount of Rs.9,465/- covered by Ext.P-16 receipt dated 20.3.2007. (The amount of Rs.9,465/- is shown in Ext.P-16 dated 20.3.2007 and the balance amount coming to Rs.535/- is shown as collection and demand draft charges, etc.). It is made clear that it is open to the 1st respondent to take up the matter with the Tahsildar or the Village Officer concerned in respect of the due remittance of amount of Rs.9,465/- covered by Ext.P-16 dated 20.3.2007. Thus, it is to be  ::12::