Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4. Learned counsel for complainant/respondent submits that the petitioner had taken Rs.10,00,000/-(Ten Lacs) from the (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16061/2019] complainant and he had given outdated cheque to the complainant. The said cheque was dishonoured. After that, petitioner did not pay the said amount. So, looking to the gravity of offence, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner be dismissed.

5. Allegation levelled against the petitioner is that the petitioner had taken Rs.10,00,000/-(Ten Lacs) from the complainant. He had given outdated cheque of SBBJ Bank, Jaipur to the complainant. Petitioner very well knew that SBBJ Bank, Jaipur has been merged into State Bank Of India. The said cheque was not honoured. After that, petitioner did not pay the said amount.