Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Heard counsel for the petitioner in both the cases.

In view of the fact that the order dated 20.2.2007 in Eviction Suit no. 11 of 2005 impugned in Civil Revision No. 841 of 2007 had been under Section 15 of the BBC Act has been passed on the basis of consent of the counsel for the petitioner appearing in the Court below, this Court would find no reason to interfere with the same.

The Court below has considered this aspect and has rightly come to the conclusion that the landlord in whose favour the order for payment of rent was passed under Section 15 of the Act was the only person who could have received the rent and, therefore, the so called pleas of advance given to some other landlady could not have been accepted at least for the purposes of compliance of the order under Section 15 of the BBC Act.

In that view of the matter, this Court would not find any merit also in the second Civil Revision application.