Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Counsel for the petitioners, however, vehemently contended that they are owners and in possession of the suit lands which forms part of the common plot of the society. Respondent No.4, therefore, cannot get any permission to develop the land. AUDA thus committed an error in granting such a permission. I am also informed that respondent No.4 has also filed a Civil Suit claiming right, title and interest over the suit land. Such suit is pending. From the record, it also emerges that by virtue of interim protection granted to the petitioners in this petition, development permission granted by AUDA could not be put to effect. Resultantly, land has not yet been developed. In any case, by virtue of such interim protection, no development has admittedly taken place on the suit land. However, counsel for the respondent No.4 submitted that only portion of Survey No.89 was sold to the society and rest is retained by the original land owners. The petitioners have, therefore, no right title and interest over the suit land which respondent No.4 desires to develop.