Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

7. I have also perused another decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in (2013) 6 Supreme Court Cases 348 in the case of Amitabhai Anilchandra Shah Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another and the relevant paragraph Nos. 35, 36 and 37 which reads as under.

"35. The above details mentioned in the charge-sheet dated 4-9-2012 clearly show that what CBI has conducted is mere "further investigation" and the alleged killing of Tulsiram Prajapati was in continuance of and an inseparable part of the conspiracy which commenced in November 2005 with the abduction of Sohrabuddin, Kausarbi and Tulsiram Prajapati and which culminated into the final stage of alleged killing of Tulsiram Prajapati who was kept under the control of accused police officers since he was a material eyewitness like Kausarbi. To put it straight, apart from the consistent stand of CBI, the charge-sheet dated 4-9-2012 itself is conclusive to show that the said charge-sheet, in law and on facts, deserves to be treated as "supplementary charge-sheet in the first FIR".