Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4. Learned P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 on the other hand vehemently oppose the prayer of the petitioner made in the instant Cr.M.P and submit that this case has been instituted for the additional offence of causing miscarriage of the informant without her consent, but it is fairly submitted that the date, when the alleged occurrence of causing miscarriage of the informant ( 2025:JHHC:35090 ) without her consent was committed, has not been mentioned in the FIR. Hence, it is submitted that this Cr.M.P., being without any merit, be dismissed.

6. The perusal of the FIR of this Jogta P.S. Case No.27 of 2019 which was lodged on 10.08.2019 reveals that in this case also, the same informant has alleged that on 27.06.2012 she married the petitioner no.1, she was alright for some years, but after the death of her father-in-law, the petitioners treated the informant with cruelty both physically and mentally on the demand of additional dowry and caused miscarriage of ( 2025:JHHC:35090 ) her child and she was not provided proper food or clothes in her matrimonial house and a secluded dirty room was provided for her living and attempt was made to kill her. On 05.02.2018, she was driven out from her matrimonial house after retaining all her jwelleries in her matrimonial house and the petitioner no.1 also used to go to her paternal house and demanded money to be given by her family members or else, he will solemnize his second marriage and whenever, the informant used to tell the petitioner no.1 to go to her matrimonial house, petitioner no.1 was threatening to kill her and when the informant went to her matrimonial house along with her brother and mother, the petitioner no.2 to 5 assaulted her causing injury to her and did not allow her to enter to her matrimonial house.