Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: cheque outdated in Satendra Malik vs Aman Sharma And Anr on 9 December, 2025Matching Fragments
2. In brief, the case of the plaintiff as discernible from the plaint and documents is that the plaintiff and the defendant were having business relations with plaintiff as defendants was one of the partner along with the plaintiff in M/s. Seetaram Construction, Deepak Vihar, Kailashpuram Colony, Tehsil Deoband, Distt. Saharanpur, UP.; that after sometime some dispute had been arose between the plaintiff and the defendants and therefore, the partnership was dissolved; that in this regard, a settlement deed was executed between the parties, on 25.11.2020; that as per the said settlement deed, the defendants have issued two cheques viz. cheque bearing no.048311 dated 25.03.2021 of Rs.1,50,000/- and cheque bearing no.048314 dated 15.07.2021 of Rs.1,00,000/- drawn upon Union Bank of India, Deoband, Distt. Saharanpur, UP in favour of the plaintiff; that the plaintiff has presented the said cheques to his banker for encashment: that upon presentation of the said cheques, the same had been dishonoured with the remarks "cheque is outdated" and "cheque with alteration cannot be processed in cheque truncation clearing system" respectively vide returning memos dated 31.03.2021 and 26.10.2021 respectively; that thereafter, the plaintiff had approached the plaintiff to pay the said amount, however, the defendant no.1 has flatly refused to pay the same: that despite requests, the defendant did not pay Rs.2,50,000/- to the plaintiff hence the plaintiff is entitled to recover from the defendants a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- along with pendentelite and future interest and that therefore, the present suit has been filed.