Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: implied overrule in M/S, Vindhyawasini T. Transport vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. on 20 February, 2018Matching Fragments
16. In Southern Painters Vs. Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. And Another, 1994 Supp (2) SCC 699, Court held in para 8 and 9 as under:
"8. The minority view of Justice Mathew is now the law. The majority view in V. Punnen Thomas case is not good law and must be considered to have been, impliedly, overruled by the Erusian case (1975) 1 SCC 70, 75. Indeed, in Joseph Vilangandan v. Executive Engineer, Buildings & Roads (PWD) Division, Ernakulam (1978) 3 SCC 36, 41 it was held:
"The majority judgment of the Kerala High Court, inasmuch as it holds that a person is not entitled to a hearing, before he is blacklisted, must be deemed to have been overruled by the decision of this Court in Erusian Equipment ..".