Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

10. The appellant has moved an application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC for producing the following documents:

Annexure P-1 Parat Sarkar in respect of mutation No. 5686.

Annexure P2 Copy of Jamabandi for the year 1971-72.

Annexure P3 Copy of Jamabandi for the year 1976-77.

Annexure P4 Copy of Jamabandi for the year 1981-82.

Annexure P5 Copy of Jamabandi for the year 2001-02.

11. So far as Annexure P1 is concerned, that is a copy of mutation of Parat Sarkar and the plaintiff has himself relied upon the copy of that mutation of Parat Sarkar Exhibit P28. Documents Annexures P2 to P5 are the copies of Jamabandies. These documents cannot be forged and there is no one to oppose the prayer of the appellants. So, these documents are admitted by way of additional evidence as Exhibit AX/1 to AX/5.

18. The appellants in all the three Regular Second Appeals have not formulated the questions of law and on the asking of the Court in view of authority in Kulwant Kaur v. Gurdial Singh , they have formulated the questions of law in all the three appeals.

19. The following questions of law formulated in Regular Second Appeal No. 3498 of 1985:

1. Whether Exhibit P28 Parat Patwar without production of Parat Sarkar carry any legal value to show the reasons for rejection of the mutation?

2. Whether the learned lower Appellate Court was duty bound being Court of law to decide all the issues'?