Punjab-Haryana High Court
Neetu @ Sahila And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 20 May, 2016
Author: Jaspal Singh
Bench: Jaspal Singh
CRM-M-17714 of 2016 --1--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-17714 of 2016
DECIDED ON: May 20, 2016
NEET @ SAHILA AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Petitioners in person along with
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate.
*****
JASPAL SINGH, J (ORAL)
This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 6.
2. Notice to respondents No. 1 to 3 only at this stage.
3. At the asking of Court, Ms. Neelam Kashyap, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State of Haryana. Copy of the petition be supplied to learned State counsel during the course of day.
4. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar, Haryana to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in their representation dated May 13, 2016 (Annexure P-4) and if respondent 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 21-05-2016 00:18:38 ::: CRM-M-17714 of 2016 --2--
No.2 finds that there is threat perception to the petitioners, he shall provide the necessary protection, if so required.
5. However, this order shall not be construed as a measure to treat the marriage of the petitioners valid or legal.
May 20, 2016 (JASPAL SINGH)
sonika JUDGE
2 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 21-05-2016 00:18:39 :::