Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: CLA act in Ajay Turi vs Union Of India Through National ... on 13 October, 2025Matching Fragments
Prayer
1. The instant appeal preferred under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 is directed against the order dated 13.06.2025 passed in Misc. Cr. Application No.705 of 2025 by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVI-cum-Special Judge, NIA, Ranchi whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail in connection with Special (NIA) No.01/2021 arising out of Balumath P.S. Case no.234 of 2020 re-registered as RC Case No.01/2021/NIA/RNC by NIA under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 504, 506, 307, 427, 435, 386, 387, 120B, 121A and 216 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1)(b), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, Sections 3 & 4 of the Explosive 2025:JHHC:31597-DB Substance Act, Section 17 of CLA Act, 1908 and Sections 10, 13, 16(1)(b), 20 and 23 of UA(P) Act, has been rejected. Facts
4. On the direction of the Ministry of Home Affairs, NIA re-registered Case No. 01/2021/NIA-RNC dated 04.03.2021 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 504, 506, 307, 427, 435, 386, 387, 120B, 121A and 216 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 25(1)(b), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, Section 3 & 4 of the Explosive Substance Act, Section 17 of CLA Act, 1908 and Section 10, 13, 16(1)(b), 20 and 23 of UA(P) Act.
5. From record it appears that the appellant has been taken into custody on 08.02.2021, as such, prayer for bail was made before the Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVI- cum-Special Judge, NIA, Ranchi but the same has been rejected vide order dated 13.06.2025 passed in Misc. Cr. Application No.705 of 2025 against which the present appeal has been filed.
(vii) He has further submitted that the appellant is a poor farmer and sole bread earner of his family and he is ready to abide by the terms and conditions imposed by this court if he is granted bail.
(viii) Learned counsel has further submitted that no offence under section 147, 148, 149, 353, 504, 506, 307, 427, 435, 386, 387 of IPC, section 25(1)(b), 26, 27 and 35 of Arms Act, section 3 & 4 of the Explosive Substance Act, section 17 CLA Act and section 10, 13, 16(1)(b), 20 and 23 of UA(P) Act are made out against the appellant. Therefore, he may be given privilege of bail.