Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. The investigation revealed that M/s Shyam Memorial Welfare Society, Sonepat (hereinafter referred to as "the society") had purchased five properties from Sh. Sanjay Choudhary and Rakesh Choudhary of Sonepat in the year 2007 vide sale deeds dated 31.10.2007. Urmila Sharma (A-1), Secretary of the society had signed the sale deeds on behalf of the society. The society had also purchased one property from Sh. Mansukh resident of Sonepat vide sale deed no.2786 dated 19.6.2008. Satish Kumar Sharma (A-3) had purchased one plot measuring 208 sq. yards, situated at Narender Nagar, Lehrara, Sonepat from Sh. Suresh Kumar Pruthi vide sale deed bearing no. 1814 dated 12.6.1998.

6. The investigation also revealed that after receiving term loan, A-1 has submitted fake/fabricated sale deeds in respect of the properties and A-3 submitted fake/fabricated sale deed in respect of his residential property, which were collateral security in the term loan. Out of these seven sale deeds submitted with the bank, six were made on non-judicial stamp papers issued by Treasury Office, Sonepat and by stamp vendor at Sonepat on 04.03.2013 and 05.03.2013. These sale deeds were taken on record on 27.02.2013 even before issuance of non-judicial stamp papers by treasury office by A-6, the then Branch Manager in connivance with A-1 to A-3. The sale deeds were never properly scrutinized/verified by A-6. The discrepancy in the sale deeds was obvious and eye catching. The discrepancy was so loud and clear that it would have raised alarm in the mind of A-6 or officer concerned, immediately by merely looking at it.

78. PW19 Umesh Batra, who was the stamp vendor, has deposed that the stamp papers (except the stamp papers of the denomination of ₹ 25,000/-) used on the sale deeds D-133, D-135, D-137, D-141 and D-143 marked as Mark PW28/B-1 to Mark PW28/B-5 respectively were issued by him on 05.03.2013 in the name of the society. He also proved the stamp papers sold by him as Ex.PW19/A (colly) to Ex.PW19/E (colly). He also deposed that the stamp of "Asst. Trea- surer Sonepat" was not there when he sold the stamp papers and fur- ther deposed that when the stamp papers are sold by vendor like him, the stamp of "Asst. Treasurer Sonepat" will not be there. In the cross examination by counsel for A-1 to A-5, he denied the suggestion that if the stamp paper of more than ₹ 100, even if sold to vendor, it has to be stamped as "Asst. Treasurer Sonepat".

79. PW36 Nitish, Asstt. Treasurer, Treasury office Sonepat has proved production-cum-receipt memo dated 04.05.2016 (D-110) Ex.PW36/B vide which IO had seized original challans for issuance of non judicial paper in the name of the society and the challans have been proved as Ex. PW36/B-1 and Ex.PW36/B-2. He also proved pro- duction-cum-receipt memo dated 22.03.2016 (D-108) as Ex.PW36/A and the relevant pages of the register for a period 24.12.2012 to 08.05.2013 as Ex.PW36/A-1 to Ex.PW36/A-3. He further deposed that non judicial stamp papers of ₹ 25000/- printed on stamp paper no. A- 534862, A-534858, A-534859, A-534861, A-534860 and A-534853 and non judicial stamp paper of ₹ 10000 printed on stamp paper no. 607652 were sold on 04.03.2013. He deposed that these stamp pa- pers were affixed with the sale deeds which are dated 31.10.2007 and stamp papers of ₹ 10000 denomination was affixed with the sale deed dated 19.06.2008 which is not possible. He also deposed that on all the stamp papers sold by him stamp of "Sahayak Khajanchi Sonepat" (in Hindi) was affixed and the same is genuine but the stamp appearing in English on the reverse side having inscription as "Asstt. Treasurer Sonepat" is not genuine stamp and was not put by him. He further deposed that all the stamp papers shown to him of the denomination of ₹ 25000 and all the stamp papers contained in sale deed Ex.PW33/B-54 were sold by him and bears his initial. In the cross examination by counsel for A-1 to A-5, no suggestion was given that the above said stamp papers were not sold on 04.03.2013 or that the same was sold in the year 2007 and 2008 respectively when the sale deeds Mark PW28/B-1 to Mark PW28/B-5 and Ex. PW33/B-54 were purportedly executed.