Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: narco analysis in State vs . 1) Kobad Ghandy on 10 June, 2016Matching Fragments
18. The Police Report states that Kobad Ghandy did not co- operate with the investigation and an application had been moved before the Ld. CMM, Delhi for permission to conduct his Narco Analysis test. The same was objected to by counsel for Kobad Ghandy on account of his bad health. A panel of doctors of AIIMS examined Kobad Ghandy on the orders of the Ld. Court and found him to be fit to undergo Narco Analysis test. By order dated 31.10.2009, permission State vs. Kobad Ghandy & Ors.
FIR No. 58 of 2009, PS: Special Cell 9/66 was granted to conduct Narco Analysis test of Kobad Ghandy but the said order was challenged before the Hon'ble High Court in which a stay was granted and matter was still pending in the Hon'ble High Court.
19. Subsequently it came to light that Rajinder Kumar @ Arvind Joshi had been arrested in FIR No. 30 of 2010 dated 08.02.2010, PS Kidwai Nagar, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) by the Special Task Force of U.P. Police. He accused revealed his name as Rajinder Kumar Fulara. He was produced in the Court of Ld. CMM, Delhi by Kanpur Police upon issuance of production warrants. He was formally arrested and his police custody was granted. He was interrogated and he gave a disclosure statement which is reproduced in the Police Report. The same is not referred to in detail, being a matter of record.