Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

11. PW-9/Insp. Pankaj Kumar deposed that on 06.07.2016, he was posted as SI and was on emergency duty from 8:00pm to 8:00am at PS Bara Hindu Rao. On that day, a call was received at the PS wide DD No. 4A already exhibited as Ex. A-3 regarding hitting of police barricade by a truck and kidnapping of Police Constable. After receiving the above said DD entry, he alongwith Ct. Vikram went to the spot of the incident i.e. DCM Chowk where he met other traffic staff who narrated the whole incident to him and in the meanwhile Constable Sandeep (Kidnap Ct.) reached to the spot and a call was also received at the PS vide DD No. 5A that the kidnapped Constable Sandeep has been pushed by the truck driver at Azad Market traffic Light. Thereafter, he recorded the complaint of Constable Sandeep which is on record and already exhibited as Ex. PW1/A. FIR no. 07/16 State Vs Ashish Kumar PS BHR Page No. 9 of 17 Thereafter, he made a Rukka on the complaint which is on record and exhibited as Ex. PW-9/A bearing his signature at point B. Thereafter, he sent the Rukka through constable Vikram to the PS for registration of FIR. Thereafter, he prepared site plans at the instance of Constable Sandeep as to the place where the accused person hit the truck at the barricade and kidnapped Constable Sandeep and also the place where Constable Sandeep was pushed by the truck driver after kidnapping. The said site plan are on record Ex. PW-9/B and Ex. PW-9/C bearing his signature at point A respectively. In the meanwhile, Constable Vikram came and handed over him the copy of the FIR already Ex. A1 and the original Rukka. Thereafter, Ct. Sandeep produced a Mobile Phone which fell down from the hand of the truck driver when he pushed Constable Sandeep and later on picked by him at Azad Market traffic light and it was seized vide seizure memo already Ex. PW1/B bearing his signature at point C. Thereafter, the complainant was taken to Hindu Rao Hospital where he was medically examined. Thereafter, the statement of witnesses U/s 161 Cr PC. were recorded by him. The CDR details of the mobile numbers found in the seized mobile phone were obtained by him which showed the presence of accused Aashish (truck driver) at the place of the incident on that intervening night of 06/07.01.2016. During course of investigation, duty roster of posted staff was collected from Sadar Bazar Circle which shows presence of all staff. Thereafter, notice u/s 133 MV Act was served to the owner of the vehicle i.e. truck No. HR 38S 2946 to join the investigation alongwith the driver but the accused applied for anticipatory bail and was granted by the Hon'ble FIR no. 07/16 State Vs Ashish Kumar PS BHR Page No. 10 of 17 Court on 01.02.2016. On 25.04.2016, accused Ashish Kumar appeared at the PS and after enquiry from the accused, accused was arrested vide memo Ex. PW9/D and personal search memo of accused is Ex. PW9/E both bearing his signature at point A respectively. Thereafter, in compliance of order of Hon'ble Court the accused was released on bail. The disclosure statement of accused was also recorded vide memo Ex. PW9/F bearing his signature at point A. Thereafter, accused was produced before Hon'ble Court in muffled face for TIP proceedings but the accused refused to undergo TIP. Thereafter, the truck involved in the present case was seized by him vide seizure memo already Ex. PW5/B bearing his signature at point B and the papers of the truck were also seized by him vide seizure memo already Ex. PW5/A bearing his signature at point C. The said papers of the truck are on record which is Ex. PW8/G (colly). The truck was released on superdari and panchnama was prepared which is already Ex. PW5/C bearing his signature at point B and the photographs of the truck was also taken which are on record and the same are already Ex. P5. After completing the investigation and recording the statement of all the witnesses u/s 161 Cr. PC, sufficient evidence were found against the accused and therefore the chargesheet in the present case was filed before the Hon'ble Court. He correctly identified accused in the court.