Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Motion Re in Sankalp Singh vs Prarthana Chandra on 1 March, 2013Matching Fragments
14. One of the essential ingredients provided therein is living separately for a period of one (1) year and, thus, unless this ground is satisfied the very basis of presentation of a petition for divorce under Section 13B of the said Act does not exist. Thus, the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the said Act would have no application to presentation of a petition under Section 13B of the said Act. Needless to add that this would only be the first motion and there has to be a compulsory wait/re-think period of, at least, six (6) months and not more than eighteen (18) months when the second motion has to be filed and the Court has to be satisfied about the joint pleas of the parties. Thus, there can be no waiver of this one (1) year period from the date of the marriage.
32. We, thus, set aside the impugned order dated 12.6.2012 with a direction to the Family Court, Patiala House to re-examine the case for grant of the first motion on the application earlier presented but permitting the parties to place on record the material in support of their application under proviso to Section 14 (1) of the said Act within fifteen (15) days from today. If a case of exceptional hardship or exceptional depravity is made out then the first motion can be passed and the second motion can be presented within the window of six (6) to eighteen (18) months from the date when the first motion could have been accepted without waiving the minimum period of six (6) months and also ensure that the period of one (1) year of separation from 12.4.2012 has expired.