Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

7. We have heard Shri Kapil Sibal learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, Shri Rupesh Kumar learned senior counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 2 and Parijat Sinha learned counsel for the State of West Bengal.

8. Shri Kapil Sibal learned senior counsel for the appellant, in support of the appeal contends that learned Sessions Judge after considering entire evidence on record had rightly come to the conclusion that evidence led by prosecution contradicts the prosecution story, as to the genesis of occurrence, hence did not commit any error in acquitting the appellant. It is contended that FIR was ante­dated and ante­timed as rightly held by the trial court. He submitted that from the evidence of PW 1 who gave the written complaint for lodging an FIR, it is clear that he went to the police station after 7.30 PM, hence the FIR could not have been lodged before 7.30­8.00 PM and mention of time of receiving the information in the FIR as 17.35 hour clearly proves that it was ante­timed.

Date : 25/11/2016 This appeal was called on for pronouncement of judgment today.

For Appellant(s) Mr. D.N. Ray, Adv.

Ms. Aditya Pujari, Adv.

Mr. Aamir Khan, Adv.

Ms. Pallavi Langar,AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Parijat Sinha,Adv.

Mr. Franklin Caesar Thomas, Adv.

Mr. Chand Qureshi, Adv.

Mr. Rupesh Kumar,Adv.

–-----