Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

.§;'7.q3z;;"oj"»gi¢s petitioners does not % fksrjzilimvzerzt aj'20' x 30' sites as cmtdningirwmuiue srtxhanefinr my fltepwpoae schgmeflsudx wig be /"I teeny": \..vur\I ur IKAMNAIAKA !'1E£:.:--l'*..,_l.'0U}'ETOF KLARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF ataII,are'permz£t1e.'dtomaIoa appmpdaw appficafion to and exemption and documents to é such request keeping. in mirzd "_t;I-.é';~;-;gztus'o}*Arhe.¥ land as on the dcmé' and w Amfifimm 'to V ~-- owners whose lands nofz'_fi£3£i,'ifi:v§'*'--.;i:v;;1d.sitiorz, notified and u;2'n7§e upheld and no finai A' V-"zifinjiaafign is In the event the EDA wncalusion that the lands of are similarly placed, than to $"fM.:H"'! \.n,:-urn Ur m.m.mm<;A rug,-V:»»:.,_:<;<';u:{'r or-' KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH couwr or KARNATAKA HE " Pariah-net's who are interested in avaflirtg this benefit ska}! make appmpriare appficazion within 30 daysfivm thedateofthisorderand tfwrecgflzr the EDA shelf give notice /2 land in Nagcwara village which is the subject matter of the czfi-resctid writ pefition pg W.ANa.2?'.57/2005 £9 partiy ' In w.R2.5so7/2004 filed Development Company in bearing syNos.17/1, 13,: 3L9, 2k<;:% .:2.-:5 cm<:i 7 % mam' at Hennur vuzage;k%Kasav:z'kHab&,%j 12 games, the Judge is the defetmg' the am of the policy csf dated 1.5.1995. On BDA wpwpfiméj 3* '*3' Wm 'M?' is said exam: of zand mm in respect of the said a.--:e:z*;cne-am is at liberty toform V appeals are disposed cfin terms of Qftierpassedirzthese writ appeals : ' E <1 Z L!..