Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Submissions of the petitioner:

11.Shri.V.Raghavachari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, the findings of the Labour Court are perverse and not supported by materials. The Ticket Checking Inspectors who checked the tickets on the relevant dates have not been examined. Exs.M-1 and M-2 have been obtained by force and coercion. P.Ws.1 to 3 have not seen the statement given by the petitioner. No enquiry has been initiated against the concerned officials from whose custody the tickets and invoices were said to be stolen by the petitioner. The criminal case filed against the petitioner has been closed in his favour. Exs.M-3 and M-6 to 8 have not been considered properly. The Enquiry Officer has put the entire onus on the petitioner wrongly. The Labour Court has not considered the evidence of the petitioner properly. The reliance made upon by the judgment of this Court by the Labour Court is bad in law.