Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4. It is the further contention of the appellant that since his terminal benefits were not settled by the authorities even after passing the final order, a representation was given on 2.11.2015. Again there was no response. Having waited for a long time, he filed W.P.No.39372 of 2015 seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to consider his representation dated 2.11.2015 and only after an order was passed by this Court, followed by another order in the http://www.judis.nic.in contempt petition, the Revenue Divisional Officer passed an order sanctioning provisional pension stating that there are several missing entries in his service register. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner has filed W.P. No.824 of 2018, for a direction to the respondents therein to forthwith consider and pass orders on the representation dated 16.09.2017 and the reminder dated 28.11.2017 of the petitioner requesting to pay salary for the period from 01.03.1983 to 23.03.1983, from 06.04.1984 to 12.12.1985 and from 23.12.1985 to 13.02.1986 with interest to the petitioner and also to take appropriate action against Mr.Murugaiyan, the then Tahsildar, Salem, for tampering with the Service Register of the petitioner as if the petitioner was paid salary for the above periods.