Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

-----------------------

W.P.C.Nos.20854 of 2010 and 27245 of 2009 have been filed seeking regularisation of daily wage employees (casual) appointed in different capacities in the Matsyafed. W.P.C.No.37735 of 2008 has been filed by certain other persons complaining of the attempt made by Matsyafed to regularise certain casual employees.

2. It is not in dispute that the appointments on causal basis were not made by following the procedure prescribed under law. In the meanwhile, Matsyafed had given a recommendation to the Government to regularise such workers. The learned counsel appearing for Matsyafed submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the request of Matsyafed has been considered and rejected by the Government. Once the Government had rejected such request for regularising the appointments of the said persons, I do not think that this Court can exercise the jurisdiction under W.P.C.NOS.20854 OF 2010, 27245 OF 2009 & 37735 OF 2008 2 Article 226 of the Consitution of India to direct the Government to regularise the said employees especially in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka v Umadevi [(2006) 4 SCC 1]. Since the Government had already rejected the request for regularising the said employees no further orders are required to be passed in W.P. (C)No.37735 of 2008.