Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: flood direction in State Of Rahjasthan vs Puti Construction Co. Ltd on 16 September, 1994Matching Fragments
(d) The arbitrators misread the statement of Shri Adi Anklesaria, because the arbitrators have only referred to answer to Question No.
27. They have failed to consider the notes to Question No. 147 wherein the said witness explained that it was not necessary in the case of construction of dam that the entire site should be made available before the work could start.
(e) The arbitrators have again misread the statements of Shri Adi Anklesaria in holding that the progress of the claimant was so fast that the claimant was directed to go slow to avoid flooding of Banswara township. It is contended that the documents on record clearly contradict the finding that the contractor was asked to go slow.