Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
"6. The undisputed fact in these cases is the appellant herein is a job
worker manufacturing LABSA for M/s. HUL. It is also undisputed that
HUL gives LAB and the appellant uses other consumables in the
manufacture of LABSA. It is also undisputed that the appellant has
been valuing the said LABSA cleared from factory premises, based
upon the cost of material plus processing charges prior to 1-4- 2007
E/40260/2015
when the provisions of Rule 10A were inserted into the Central
Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. It is also undisputed that the said
LABSA is returned back to M/s. HUL for further consumption in their
factory premises for manufacturing of soaps and detergents. It is
nobody s case that LABSA consumed by HUL is on behalf of the
appellant herein.