Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 420,408 ipc in Jeet Singh vs State on 27 January, 2026Matching Fragments
2026.01.27 17:05:34 +0530 Saket Courts, New Delhi whereby the appellant/convict was held guilty for the offences punishable under sections 408/467/471/420 IPC and u/s.120-B read with sections 408/467/471/420 IPC and acquitted u/s. 477A of IPC and consequently sentenced to five years of RI and fine of Rs. 25 lakhs, in default on year SI u/sec 408 IPC, five years of RI and fine of Rs. 25 lakhs, in default one year SI u/sec 467 IPC, two years of RI and fine of Rs. 25 lakhs, in default one year SI u/sec 471 IPC, five years of RI and fine of Rs.25 lakhs, in default on year SI u/sec 420 IPC and five years of RI and fine of Rs. 50 lakhs, in default two years SI u/sec. 120-B IPC.
2. Briefly stated the case of the prosecution was that appellant/ accused Jeet Singh along with co-accused Gursharan Singh embezzled and cheated the complainant Company with a sum of Rs. 28.51 lakhs by forging the signatures of the authorized signatory of the Company and also misusing some of the signed cheques and misappropriated the said amount. Further both of the accused persons prepared forged and fabricated statement of account and accused Jeet Singh made incorrect entries in the ledger account to keep the complainant Company in dark with respect to the particulars being filed by him in the cheques in question. 2.1 On the said complaint FIR no. 325/1999, PS CR Park under section 408/467/471/420 IPC read with section 120-B IPC was registered.
Chargesheet was filed against both the accused persons. During the trial ten witnesses were examined by the Prosecution and after hearing final _____________________________________________________________ CA NO. 360/2017 Jeet Singh Vs. The State by PAGE NO. 2 OF 56 GEETANJALI Date:
2026.01.27 17:05:44 +0530 arguments accused Jeet Singh was convicted for the offence under Section 408/467/471/420 IPC read with section 120-B IPC and co-accused Gursharan Singh was convicted u/s. 120-B IPC read with 408/467/471/420 IPC and punished for the same. Aggrieved by said judgment, the present appeal has been filed on behalf of convict Jeet Singh. GROUNDS OF APPEAL:-
6. The charge 408/467/471/477-A/420 IPC read with section 120-B IPC was framed in the present case on the basis of the complaint made by Sh.
Sunil Sachdeva and the applicant/ accused was convicted for offence punishable u/s. 408/467/471/420 IPC and u/s. 120-B read with section 408/467/471/420 IPC and was acquitted for offence puninshable u/s. 477A IPC.
6.1 Section 408 IPC deals with whoever, being a clerk or servant or employed as a clerk or servant, and being in any manner entrusted in such capacity with property, or with any dominion over property. 6.2 Section 467 IPC deals with Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. Whoever forges a document which purports to be a valuable security or a will, or an authority to adopt a son, or which purports to give authority to any person to make or transfer any valuable security, or to receive the principal, interest or dividends thereon, or to receive or deliver any money, movable property, or valuable security, or any document purporting to be an acquittance or receipt acknowledging the payment of money, or an acquittance or receipt for the delivery of any movable property or valuable _____________________________________________________________ CA NO. 360/2017 Jeet Singh Vs. The State PAGE NO. 14 OF 56 security.