Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: under section 354B in Narender Sejwal & Ors vs State Of Delhi & Anr on 31 January, 2022Matching Fragments
% 31.01.2022 (Through Video Conferencing) The petitioners, vide the present petition seek the quashing of the FIR No.335/2020, PS Malviya Nagar, under Sections 354/354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, qua which the Investigating Officer SI Mamchand, PS Malviya Nagar, states to the effect that the investigation conducted is in relation to the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 233/354/354B/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the petition is thus treated as one qua the said offences.
The present Investigating Officer of the case is present and has identified the petitioner nos.1 to 3 i.e. petitioner No.1 Mr. Narender Sejwal, petitioner No.2 Mr. Surender Sejwal and petitioner No.3 Mr. Ramesh Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUMIT GHAI Signing Date:01.02.2022 12:58:56 This file is digitally signed by PS to HMJ ANU MALHOTRA.
Chand, present through video conferencing, as being the three accused arrayed in FIR No.335/2020, PS Malviya Nagar, under Sections 233/354/354B/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and has also identified the respondent no.2 Ms. Priti as being the complainant of the said FIR.
The respondent no.2 in her deposition on oath in replies to specific Court queries has affirmed having signed the affidavit dated 09.10.2021 as her non opposition to the prayer made by the petitioners seeking the quashing of the FIR No.335/2020, PS Malviya Nagar, under Sections 233/354/354B/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and also testified having signed the settlement document dated 14.01.2021 as also the joint statement dated 24.03.2021 recorded in in HMA No.516/21 in proceedings under Section 13 (B) (1) of the HMA, 1955, voluntarily of her own accord without any duress, coercion or pressure from any quarter.
against the petitioners.
It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the respondent No.2 is unable to be present at the place where the demand draft is being handed over as she is suffering from a physical ailment.
The respondent No.2 in her deposition on oath apart from stating that she does not oppose the prayer made by the petitioners seeking the quashing of the FIR No.335/2020, PS Malviya Nagar, under Sections 233/354/354B/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, submits to the effect that the petitioners have since understood their mistakes and that she has moved on in her life and has remarried on 17.11.2021 and thus wants to live her own life without any problems anymore.