Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

5. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Review Petition before the first respondent raising certain contentions with regard to the charges framed on him. It is contended that the Tahsildar rejected the house pattas to those 18 persons and thereafter, only issued charge memo which is nothing but false https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ and there was no loss caused to the Revenue department. Further, the petitioner raised contentions that he made enquiry properly on issuance of community certificate to daughters of Vaiyapuri and after verifying the Service Register of Vaiyapuri, he noted the caste as Hindu-Parayan and as such violating the The Tamil Nadu Civil Services Rules is not at all correct and the punishment has been awarded to him without proper enquiry and opportunity.