Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

In support of his submissions, he had relied upon the following judgments:-

1. 2007 (141) DLT 661
2. 2006 (129) DLT 272
3. 2006 (92) DRJ 331
4. Writ petition (Civil) No. 766/1996 tilted as "Narender Kumar Parwanda Vs. Union of India"
decided on 25.07.2006
5. 2006(131) DLT 202
6. 2006 (127) DLT 88
7. 2005 (118) DLT 665
8. 2003 (102) DLT 702 On the other hand, Ld Counsel for respondent had argued that Ld. Trial Court has rightly held the suit to be barred by limitation. Dilating upon the said issue, it was argued by Ld. Counsel that appellant had himself has tendered his resignation vide letter dated 31.07.1993 and had also relinquished his charge to the Principal Incharge vide letter dated 31.08.1993 which points out that his resignation was duly accepted and was informed to him. Ld. Counsel had also referred to the correspondence exchanged between the party wherein appellant claimed himself to be Ex-principal of the school which also points out towards his knowledge about the acceptance of resignation submitted by him. Ld. Counsel had also argued that the resignation of appellant being tendered and accepted in 1993 while the suit filed in 1998, is bitterly barred by limitation and therefore, the present appeal has no merits.