Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

mb In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.O. No. 1499 of 2018 Md. Anwar Alam Khan

-Vs.-

Md. Sayed Jan, since deceased, represented by Mrs. Md. Sayed Jan & Ors.

Mr. Md. Quamruddin Khan, Mr. Sankar Paul ...for the petitioner The facts of the present case are rather peculiar. The petitioner obtained an eviction decree against the judgment- debtors/opposite parties and levied execution by way of Ejectment Execution Case No. 86 of 2013. Meanwhile, the opposite parties preferred an appeal against the eviction decree and took out an application for stay of execution of eviction decree in connection with the said appeal. Initially, such prayer for stay was refused by the appellate court, which was challenged by the judgment-debtors in revision before this Court, thereby giving rise to C.O. No. 131 of 2014. A co-ordinate bench of this Court, by order dated March 03, 2014 allowed the said revisional application, granting stay of the execution proceeding till disposal of the title appeal, subject to payment of all arrear occupation charges and current rent regularly by the judgment-debtors. Thereafter, a dispute arose as to the quantum of the occupation charges payable in terms of the order dated March 03, 2014. An application was taken out by the petitioner with a prayer to direct the judgment-debtors to pay Rs.66,675/- per month as damages/mesne profits. On the other hand, the judgment-debtors/opposite parties filed an application for permission to deposit arrears rent for the months of June, 2013 to March, 2014 at the rate of Rs.80/- per month, along with current rent. The appellate court, vide Order No. 14 dated May 05, 2014, refused the prayer of the present petitioner, but allowed the application of the judgment-debtors/opposite parties by permitting the opposite parties to deposit arrears of rent and current rent at the rate of Rs.80/- per month.