Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: mathadi worker in Pratap Kashinath Gulve vs The State Of Maharashtra on 1 April, 2024Matching Fragments
EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF PROSECUTION IN TRIAL COURT
5. PW1 Ganpati Gyandeo Bhosale, father of victim, deposed about having two daughters aged 13 and 15 years respectively. According to him, on 21-11-1993 his both daughters went to answer call of nature but only one of them returned. Accused had taken away victim daughter and inspite of search, when she was not found, he lodged report exh.34.
6. PW2 Sangita Ganpati Bhosale, victim stated that in the year {5} CRI APPEAL 138 OF 2002 1993, she was 13 years of the age. On 21-11-1993 she and her sister went to answer call of nature. After crossing distance of two furlong from their house, accused was spotted near S.T.Stand. He forcibly pushed her in a Bus and took her to Osmanabad and from their took her to another Bus going to Yedashi and then finally took her to Barshi and from their to Kolhapur. There they resided at Shahu Market and accused worked as a Mathadi worker. There he established sexual intercourse with her and also performed marriage with her in a Temple at Kolhapur. She had two children from him. He had forcibly taken her and established sexual intercourse. Then she stated that thereafter, accused developed illicit relations with another lady and left her for two years. During such period, she stayed with mother-in-law.