Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

1. 29.04.82 308/34 IPC Kalyan Puri

2. 02.03.84 452/324/34 IPC Kalyan Puri

3. 08.11.85 308/506/427/323/34 IPC Kalyan Puri

4. 19.02.91 307/506/34 IPC Kalyan Puri

5. 09.01.93 147/148/149/323 IPC Trilok Puri

6. 10.08.93 304-A IPC Trilok Puri

7. 05.01.99 452/342/323/354/427/34 IPC Trilok Puri

8. 11.09.99 354/509/323/506/34 IPC Trilok Puri

9. 12.09.09 452/308/34 IPC Trilok Puri

10. 29.10.01 458/323/427/506 IPC Trilok Puri Whereas the Respondent was convicted in relation to the instances and/ or the first information reports detailed at Sr. No. 4 and 9 hereof, in other cases, he was acquitted except in the cases detailed at Sr. Nos. 1 and 10 under Sections 308/34 and 458/323/427/506 of the Indian Penal Code respectively which are said to be still pending.

(7) The provisions of section 445, section 446, section 447 or section 448 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to all bonds executed under this section."

The proposal to initiate an appropriate proceeding under the Act was considered in the noting / proceeding dated 7th August, 2003 of Respondent No. 3 herein, which reads as under:

"Two public witnesses appeared before Shri V.V. Chaudhary the then Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police/ East to depose against Ved Prakash @ Vedu s/o Shri Prem Singh, r/o S-4, Pandav Nagar, Delhi. Camera statements recorded. On the basis of the material placed before me and after discussing the same with ACP Kalyan Puri and S.H.O./ Pandav Nagar and after having gone through the statement of camera witnesses, I am satisfied that sufficient grounds exist for proceeding against the respondent under Section 47, DP Act."