Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. The applicant has also submitted that despite the order dated 30.10.2009 to the effect that the intervening period shall not be counted as period spent on duty as far as pecuniary benefits of service are concerned, the respondents have not even granted the notional benefits of the said termination period. In other words, the respondents have failed even in granting this limited relief. He has, therefore, sought the following reliefs in this Original Application:-

(a) quash and set aside the impugned actions/orders of the respondent to the extent they deny of monetary benefits for the period the applicant was kept out of service due to the wrong termination order and/or