Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

MACT No. 151/17 Ms. Urmila Mishra Vs. Sh. Jamir Hassan & Ors. Page No 9 of 20

(i) Age of deceased: The age of deceased is necessary to apply the multiplier. As per the 10 th class certificate of deceased Ex.PW1/5, his date of birth was 5.12.1992 and the accident took place on 05.06.2016, accordingly, the age of deceased was 23 years at the time of accident.

(ii) Determination of Income of deceased : After deciding the age of deceased, his income needs to be determined. The father of deceased examined as PW1 deposed that at the time of accident, his son was a final year student of ITI (Electronics) and he would have earned Rs.50,000/- after completion of the course. The deceased was pursuing his final year of ITI (Electronics) Course from CRPF Industrial Training Center, Wazirabad, Delhi. The petitioners have not placed on record any document nor have examined any competent witness to prove the minimum and maximum pay packages which were being offered to ITI students of CRPF Industrial Training Center through Campus Placements. There is no material on record on the basis of which it can be inferred that the deceased could have earned a salary of Rs.50,000/- per month. Considering the academic record of deceased, the institute from which he was pursuing his ITI Course and the fact that he had the aspiration to join CRPF as Head Constable for which he had also cleared the physical examination, it can be inferred that even if he would not have cleared the CRPF examination, he would have worked in a Private Sector and MACT No. 151/17 Ms. Urmila Mishra Vs. Sh. Jamir Hassan & Ors. Page No 10 of 20 would have earned at least Rs.15,000/- per month. Thus, the annual income of deceased comes to be Rs.1,80,000/-.