Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: function of functionary in Jagdish Mitr vs Union Of India And Ors. on 26 September, 1989Matching Fragments
(6) The learned counsel for the petitioner has cited Smt. Shalini Soni versus Union of India; wherein the Supreme Court has laid down the law : "IT is an unwritten rule of the law, constitutional and administrative, that whenever a decision-making function is entrusted to the subjective satisfaction of a statutory functionary, there is an implicit obligation to apply his mind to pertinent and proximate matters only, eschewing the irrelevant and the remote."
It has further been observed in the above-cited case that: "WHERE there is further an express statutory obligation to communicate not merely the decision but the grounds on which the decision is founded, it is a necessary corollary that the grounds communicated, that is, grounds so made known, should be seen to pertain to pertinent and proximate matters and should comprise all the constituent facts and materials that went in to make up the mind of the statutory functionary and not merely ihe inferential conclusions."