Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

6. Vide order dated 05.04.2019, the Ld. Predecessor was pleased to frame charges under Sec. 379 IPC read with Sec. 34 IPC & Sec. 411 IPC against all the accused persons while additional charge under Sec. 413 IPC read with Sec. 34 IPC against accused persons namely Anita, Imla, Indu and Kavita.

7. To prove its case, prosecution has examined 06 witnesses. However, the prosecution has not examined complainant Smt. Kiran Chadha. Complainant Smt. Kiran Chadha has compounded the offences punishable under Section 379/411/34 IPC with accused persons and the proceedings under Section 379/411/34 IPC against accused persons were disposed off by the Ld. Predecessor vide order dated 12.11.2022. The effect of compounding after framing of charge amounts to acquittal. Thus, due to the compounding of offences under Sec. 379/411/34 IPC, all the six accused persons were acquitted for the offence punishable under Sec. 379/411/34 IPC. Since accused persons State Vs. Anita & Ors.

FIR No. 832/2015, PS Kashmere Gate (Metro) Page No. 15 of 17 compounded the offence punishable under Sec. 411/34 IPC with the complainant, it amounted to their acquittal under Sec. 411/34 IPC.

24. Since the prosecution has failed to prove the ingredients of offences punishable under Sec. 413/34 IPC beyond reasonable doubts against accused persons namely Anita, Indu, Imla and Kavita, they are hereby acquitted for the offence punishable under Sec. 413/34 IPC. Due to the compounding of offences punishable under Sec. 379/411/34 IPC, all the accused persons namely Anita, Imla, Indu, Kavita, Laxmi and Kamla stood acquitted under Sec. 379/411/34 IPC on 12.11.2022.