Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(h)A termination of a contractual appointment though made thrice in 18 months, will not be an illegal retrenchment as per decision Municipal Council Samarala V. Sukhwinder Kaur 2006-6-SCC-516.
(i)The termination of a workman who has worked on a project for more than 4 years will be legal if the management fails to pay the retrenchment compensation at the time of termination as per decision Gujarat State Construction Corporation V. Indravadan Ambalal Soni 2003 (99) FLR 850 (Guj HC).
(j)The non-renewal of contract of an employee who was engaged on a daily wage basis will not amount to retrenchment as per decision Surendra Kumar V. Labour Court Uttarpradesh, Agra and another 2005 LLR 84 (All HC).
(k)If a workman has not rendered continuous service for 240 days, the provisions of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act providing for the right of re-employment to a retrenched workman will not be attracted as per decision State of Gujarat V. Ramesh Mopabhai Rathod 2004 LLR 255 (Guj HC).
(l)If an employee has not worked for 240 days, his termination will not amount to retrenchment as per decision Har Nath Singh Yadav V. The Administration/Chairman Provincial Cooperative Federation, Lucknow and others 2004 LLR 741 (All HC).
(m)A termination of a workman on completion of project will not be a retrenchment as per decision Telecom District Manager and others V. A.A. Angali and others 2000 LLR 219 (Ker HC).
(n)The Labour Court can substitute the relief with compensation when retrenchment is invalid as per decision Lala Ram V. State of Rajesthan and another 2001 LLR 802 (Raj HC).

36.It is to be pointed out that the Writ Petitioner/Petitioner (in I.D.No.206/1996) has taken a plea that he has worked for more than 240 days prior to the date of his termination and as such, he is entitled to the protection as per Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.