Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: RAM NAIK in Sansar Chand And Anr. vs State Of J And K on 21 December, 2005Matching Fragments
24. This judgment is not of any help to the learned Counsel as the house in the present case is lonely and minor children were present at the place of occurrence and their helpless mother was subjected to rape in their presence, which is proved from the F.S.L. Report. The presence of human semen/spermatozoa has been admitted by Sh. J.L. Fotehdar, Asstt. Director, F.S.L, Jammu.
25. Further submission of learned Counsel for the accused is that the scribe of the F.I.R. has not been examined and in support of his submission, he has relied upon para 14 of the judgment delivered by the Apex Court in case titled, Surendra Pratap Chauhan v. Ram Naik and Ors., reported in AIR 2001 SC 164, which is extracted as under: