Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

- 24 -

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 886 of 2022 SC & ST Social Welfare Assn."10 where the Hon'ble Apex Court held as follows:

"Having regard to the above observations and clarifications we have no doubt that such of the applicants whose claim to seniority and consequent promotion on the basis of the principles laid down in the Allahabad High Court's judgment in Parmanand Lal case have been upheld or recognized by the Court or the Tribunal by judgment and order which have attained finality will not be adversely affected by the contrary view now taken in the judgment in Madras Telephones. Further, Division Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh in WP No. 3257/2017, State of M.P. vs. Maharaj Singh) has held on 30 July, 2019 has held:
"21. Having regard to the above observations and clarification we have no doubt that such of the applicants whose claim to seniority and consequent promotion on the basis of the principles laid down in
- 26 -
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 886 of 2022 the Allahabad High Court's judgment in Parmanand Lal case have been upheld or recognized by the Court or the Tribunal by judgment and order which have attained finality will not be adversely affected by the contrary view now taken in the judgment in Madras Telephones. Since the rights of such applicants were determined in a duly constituted proceedings, which determination has attained finality, a subsequent judgment of a court or tribunal taking a contrary view will not adversely affect the applicants in whose cases the orders have attained finality. We order accordingly."