Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

8. "A perusal of the document (Annexure-3) which is filed along with supplementary affidavit dated 27.07.2013 discloses the brief medical history of the present applicant. The medicines prescribed by the doctor are all general and routine medicines relating to abdominal pain. The diagnosis shows Chronic Colitis and the document dated 08.08.2013 which has been tendered in the Court indicates that a Colonoscopy & Segmental Biopsy of the present applicant has been advised by the doctor, from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi as these facilities are not available at Ranchi. The documents provided and filed in this proceeding do not indicate any serious ailment to the applicant.

9. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant has submitted that the applicant was not at all ready to go to New Delhi for medical check up however, under the pressure of the State Authorities, he was sent to New Delhi for treatment.

10. In the supplementary affidavit dated 18.10.2013, the applicant has stated as under :

10. "That I say that after the rejection of the petitioner's bail application by this Hon'ble Court on 14.08.2013, the health of the petitioner deteriorated further. Thereafter, on the advice of the jail doctor, the petitioner was treated by the doctors at Patliputra Medical College and Hospital, Dhanbad who, after constituting a medical board, referred the petitioner to Rajendra Institute of Medical Science, Ranchi. At this juncture it may pertinently be mentioned that the petitioner was inter alia required to get colonoscopy and segmental autopsy tests done but the Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi also did not have the instruments and specialization to carry out the aforesaid tests and therefore, the Director, RIMS, Ranchi constituted a medical board under his chairmanship and thereafter recommended the petitioner to be taken to All India Institute Medical Sciences, New Delhi."

13. That I say that the petitioner was refused admission by AIMS but was being treated by the Out Patient Department at AIMS and therefore, had to be lodged at Jharkhand Bhawan, Delhi. During his stay at Delhi, the petitioner had undergone many medical tests and as a matter of fact, has been advised by the doctors at AIMS to visit again on 24.10.2013 for colonoscopy which could not be done earlier."