Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

The specific case of the pre-emptors is that they have common boundary as contiguous tenant with Plot No. 809 but in written statement, Sovana Mahapatra has categorically averred in paragraph 14 that by virtue of her ownership in Plot No. 809 she has longest common boundary in the said plot. Therefore, by virtue of holding .01 decimal of land of Plot No. 809, the pre-emptor cannot claim to a longest common boundary which fact has been lost sight of by the learned Trial Court.