Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

11. On the date of final hearing, Sri Rao, advocate for IRFC, presented an application to direct the appellant and Videocon to answer certain interrogatories and discover certain documents as per annexures to the application. Both interrogatories to be answered and documents to be produced, according to us, were irrelevant inasmuch as the decision of the board, even assuming that it bad power to pass such resolution, was not with reference to the impugned bonds but was of a general nature. The appellant or Videocon answering the interrogatories or discovering documents, is not going to throw any light on the reason for refusal as the decision of the company to refuse registration was on the basis of the decision taken by the board in a general way and not with specific reference either to Videocon or to the appellant. Therefore, we informed counsel that there was no need to entertain the application and as such we did not admit the application.