Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: apprentice preference in P.S.Vinoth vs Union Of India on 13 March, 2019Matching Fragments
“8.... At the time of selection
process, if other things being equal,
trained apprentices shall be given
preference. As such the ratio decidendi of the said judgment is only to the http://www.judis.nic.in aforesaid fact and nowhere it is stated that a person having qualification in the trade of Turner should not be considered for the post of Machinist. In the light of the above finding the said letter dated 06.01.2011 is analyzed. It is glaringly clear that there are misconceptions on the part of the Board in construing the purport of the judgment of the Hon'ble Madras High Court and because of that the Board deviated from the erstwhile practice of allowing even Turners to participate in the selection process for the post of Machinist in the 3rd Respondent factory.
establishment shall invite candidates by publication in newspapers and other media, and then consider the cases of all the candidates, who have applied, and,in the selection process, other http://www.judis.nic.in things being equal, trained apprentices shall be given preference. The said procedure shall be adopted on future occasions and the appointments made hitherto shall stand unchanged.” 4.9. The Learned Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3 draws the attention of this Court that the 2nd Respondent filed S.L.P.No.21454 of 2008 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the same was dismissed. Hence, the 2nd Respondent issued an instruction dated 06.01.2011 stating that all the appointments in the industrial trades should be made only from the open market wherein all Ex-trades apprentices have to compete with the outside candidates. After the issuance of O.F. Board instructions dated 06.01.2011, it is envisaged that no interchanging of trades is permissible and the candidates for direct recruitment in the Machinist trade must have NCTVT certificate in the relevant trade.