Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

- 75 -

students who had failed in the Theory papers on the basis of assessment under Double Valuation Method.

6. Following the directions given in the case of Sri Neelesh Mehta (supra), the respondent-University issued a circular dated 01.09.2020 notifying the students willing to seek for two more valuations to submit their request on or before 10.09.2020 by 5.00 p.m. to Registrar (Evaluation). One more circular was issued on 14.09.2020, calling upon students who had not submitted the request as per the previous circular, giving them one more opportunity to submit their request on or before 16.09.2020, by 12:00 noon. It is submitted that the respondent-University conducted two additional valuations of over 14,000 answer papers in compliance of the directions issued by this Court. However, the respondent-University notified on 13.10.2020, the new Amendment to Ordinance stating that all answer scripts of UG course shall be subjected to Digital Valuation by four evaluators in which 50% of them by Internal Examiners and 50% by External Examiners of different

25. Consequent to the striking down of the previous Ordinance dated 29.03.2019, the amended Ordinance dated 13.10.2020 was notified, providing for evaluation of all answer scripts of UG courses by "Digital Evaluation" by four evaluators in which 50% of them by Internal Examiner and 50% by External Examiners of different universities other than RGUHS. What is noticeable is that the impugned Ordinance once again sought to make a deviation when compared to the Ordinance governing the PG students, where provision is made for fifth valuation, if the difference of percentage of marks between the four evaluators was