Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: arsh in Aditya Chauhan vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 26 July, 2024Matching Fragments
Ashutosh Sanolta ......Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ......Respondent For the petitioner: Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Hemant K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
____________________________________________________________ Abhay Chauhan ......Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ......Respondent .
3. Since the bail petitioners are in custody since 05.04.2024, therefore, with the consent of parties, all these petitions are taken up for disposal together, by a common order.
FACTUAL MATRIX
4. Case set up by Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Learned Senior Advocate for bail petitioners [Aditya Chauhan, Paras Justa and Abhay Chauhan] and Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate for the bail petitioner [Ashutosh Sanolta] and .
Report dated 11.07.2024, on the Instructions of SHO, Police Station Theog, District Shimla [H.P.], which was taken on record and the copy of the Status Report(s) were furnished to Learned Senior Counsel Mr. Ajay Kochhar and Mr. Arsh Chauhan and Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate(s), for respective petitioner(s).
On receipt of the Status Report(s), the Learned Counsel(s) have prayed for hearing the matter finally.
Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, all these petitions were finally heard and are decided by a common order.
on 10.04.2024.
In terms of the Status Report, the Learned State Counsel has prayed for rejection of the bail application(s), at this stage.
7. Heard, Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Arsh Chauhan and Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate for the bail petitioner(s) and Mr. Hemant K. Verma, Learned Deputy Advocate General for the Respondent and have perused the available material.