Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

statement recorded on 17.08.2009 is allegedfby :th'e..counse'if0_r petitioner as concocted. Petitioner 'was reieased onA._a._stat'utory.VuI bail, but was on bail from 06.06.2000; per imposed, she was regularly appearing 'n.e_fore Officer in each of these cases on 15' and 15f1?...9f On each day of her has neither questioned further investigation in those cases. A"'1fh4'erefore; A:--0:1"t--»waaincumbent on the respondent to explain under.what.ivcirchurnstances for the first time after lapse of was shown as an accused in OR No."212}:2,eo'os..;§;1a._§;1"oavimzo/2009. 30:} cannot ignore the fact that when one crime is registered i*La.is hrought to the notice of the Investigating Officer, the If particiuiar person is a suspect of having committed such crime and 0 nfsuch offender were to be in judiciai custody in any other /' proceedings, the law requires under the provisions of Section 267 of Cr.P.C., that whenever in the course of enquiry. trial or other proceedings under this code, it appears that a person confi-n_ed_ or detained in prison should be brought before -'fo_r answering a charge or for any purpose before Co'u'1t= ga"Witness."