Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

1. The suit out of which these two connected appeals arise was instituted by the plaintiffs Gopinath, Ramprasad and Mangilal against the defendants Rami'ilal, Smt. Durga Devi and Surajnarain under Section 92, C. P. C. after obtaining the sanction of the Advocate General of Rajasthan, Subsequently Sun-derlal was also added as defendant No. 4. The plaintiffs claim that defendant No. 1 Ramjilal, defendant No. 3 Surajnarain and defendant No. 4 Sunderlal be removed as trustees in respect of a Bagichi and Dharamshala situated in the Gangapur city, District Sawai Madhopur, and other suitable persons be appointed as trustees. Another prayer contained in the plaint was that the gift deed dated 4-7-53 executed in favour of defendant No. 2 Durga Devi by defendant No. 1 Ramjilal in respect of property marked as No. 2 in the site plan Ex. X alleged to be a part of the trust property be declared void and ineffective. Lastly it was prayed that if defendant No. 3 Surajnarain is found to be in possession of any part of the alleged trust property, he may be dispossessed and the possession of the same be handed over to the trustees who may be appointed afresh.