Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

8. It is vehemently argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the call letter showed that there was test and interview. But no test was conducted. In fact there is no case for the parties that any test was conducted. The contention that the applicant was under the impression that the test would be conducted after the interview is too hard to be digested. If any test is to be conducted that would only precede the interview. It is not the practice of conducting test after the interview is over. In fact no test was required considering the nature of the appointment to the post of Fish Processing Worker. The important criteria was regarding experience the candidates had in the relevant field. The respondents would contend that a selection committee was constituted to fill up the 4 vacancies of Processing Workers Gr.III. That committee consisted of Shri Jai Singh Meena, Deputy Director as Chairman, Dr. M.K.Venu PT, Shri PV Ravindran Nair, Accounts Officer, Shri Varghese John, Marketing Officer and Shri K.K.Mohammed Basheer, PT (processing Technologist) as Members and Shri G.D.Rajeev, Assistant General Manager, Matsyafed as External Member. No plea questioning the integrity, impartiality or efficiency of any of these Members was raised. In other words, though it was stated that the interview was held arbitrarily without considering the certificates etc. no malafide could be attributed against any of these members.