Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
f) The said construction activities were undertaken without the consent
of the petitioner, however, once the petitioner was apprised of the
same, the petitioner made several representations to the Archeological
Survey of India (hereinafter "respondent No.2"), however no action
was taken by the respondent no.2.
g) Subsequently, the Competent Authority of NCT of Delhi vide letter
dated 3rd August 2017, directed the learned Superintending
Archeologist of India of the respondent no.2, to further direct the
Conservation Assistant / Surveyor to examine the case and initiate
action as per the provisions of AMASR (A&V) Act, 2010.However,
the same has not been acted upon by the respondents.